project27:Performance

From rerdm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Feasibility)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Interaction==
+
==Activities in Open House==
 +
[[OH perf Axonometric view unit.jpg| 900px]]
 +
In the Open House project, the main housing activities are divided into two spaces: the lower floor and the Playroom. Where the lower floor houses the hygiene and storing, students can do the rest in the upper dynamic space.
  
'''Ability to share spaces'''
+
==Structure==
 
+
Students have to be able to share spaces. This will be mainly focused on the spaces where students relax, study, eat, cook and sleep.
+
 
+
'''Ability to adjust floorplan'''
+
 
+
According to their own lifestyle, students will be able to adjust the spatial configuration of their units according to their unique needs. In order to stay realistic, hygiene activities will be excluded from this ambition. Thereby the location of for instance watersupply does not have to be changed.
+
  
'''Ability to enlarge spaces'''
+
'''Main structural Logig'''
 +
The construction of Open House mainly exists out of attached pixel components.
  
This is practically a combination of the two needs above mentioned. When students (temporarily) need more space, their neighbors can adjust their floorplan and the space will reserved for the one who is in need for it.
 
  
 
==Variants on the interaction==
 
==Variants on the interaction==
Line 49: Line 45:
 
'''Older diagram of connected boxes in scenario'''
 
'''Older diagram of connected boxes in scenario'''
  
==Structure==
 
 
'''Lightness'''
 
 
==Climate==
 
 
'''Lightness'''
 
==Detailing==
 
  
 
==Feasibility==
 
==Feasibility==

Revision as of 23:39, 18 January 2013

Contents

Activities in Open House

900px In the Open House project, the main housing activities are divided into two spaces: the lower floor and the Playroom. Where the lower floor houses the hygiene and storing, students can do the rest in the upper dynamic space.

Structure

Main structural Logig The construction of Open House mainly exists out of attached pixel components.


Variants on the interaction

900px Multiple floors variant A: one floor of boxes per floor


900px Multiple floors variant B: one body of boxes per floor


900px Multiple floors variant C: foldable walls


900px Multiple floors variant D: elevator units


900px Single floor variant A: self supporting


900px Single floor variant B: external support


900px

OpenHouse OpenSpace VariantC.jpg Older diagram of connected boxes


Model.jpg Older diagram of connected boxes in scenario


Feasibility

Strengths

-Changability of the Open House alignes with a differentiated of space for all students.

-Population students is relatively easy to house in general

-Population students are the first to keep an eye on the street and give the Re-RDM a real city-buzz.

-Project is showcase for the Learn and Play environment - here comes playing and learning together in a sustainable way.

-Project could be built gradually.


Weaknesses

-Never been done application in architecture is of relatively high risk

-High-maintainance

-Components are relatively expensive


Opportunities

Threats